Solutions
TwitterFacebook
Main Menu

Posted by on Aug 1, 2017

Evaluate Source Quality

How do you know whether a source is a worthwhile one?

You can demonstrate your competence and credibility by using impressive sources in your work. Depending on your subject, ‘impressive’ might include your grandmother, the local newspaper, a website, or a print magazine.

However, in 90% of your writing, there is a very clear hierarchy of importance:

  1. Scholarly Sources
    ‘Scholarly’ refers to the way an article is published. A scholarly article is reviewed by volunteers who are recognized experts in a given field. Most databases (like Proquest or Lexis-Nexis) have an option to require ‘scholarly’ or ‘peer-reviewed’ sources only. Using Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/)
    Depending on your instructor, school, and writing situation certain government websites may be considered scholarly (think the Center for Disease Control for statistics on illness, or the Census Bureau for facts on population growth).
  2. Print Sources
    Print sources include nationally recognized newspapers and magazines (think The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, Wired Magazine etc.). They have dedicated editorial boards and fact checkers that assure the content published is of a high quality. Even though these are ‘print’ sources, you will most likely access them via a computer.
  3. Primary Sources
    Primary sources are first-hand accounts, so this is where your grandmother may become important. If you are writing about America in the 1950s, your grandmother may be an expert witness. So you would be establishing your credibility if you were to quote “a woman who was born in 1948 and who lived through the 1950s in an all-American town.”
  4. Websites
    Your credibility falls off a cliff when you start using commercial websites. Can you use a quote from an Apple Computer spokesperson concerning the importance of good software design? Maybe…but the reason Apple’s website would contain such information is to achieve its own rhetorical goals – not to present information fairly. By the time you get to blogs, Wikipedia, and other content created by non-experts (or that is completely anonymous) you are wasting your time to quote directly.This is not to say that information found from such sources is worthless. Information you find from these kinds of sources can be incredibly important – you just need to find a more credible source for the same information. You will also learn more about your subject by consulting these sites, and can refine your search terms when using better quality sources. Research is, by its nature, iterative. Often you have to read a lot to find a few useful sources.

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.